Index name

CCME Water Quality Index

Scientist who Developed Index: Name, Institute; Year; First Reference;

CCME Water Quality Index (2001)

Abstract (Summary):

A CCME Water Quality Index provides a convenient means of summarizing complex water quality data and facilitating its communication to a general audience. The CCME Water Quality Index (1.0) is based on a formula developed by the British Columbia Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks and modified by Alberta Environment. The Index incorporates three elements: scope – the number of variables not meeting water quality objectives; frequency – the number of times these objectives are not met; and amplitude – the amount by which the objectives are not met. The index produces a number between 0 (worst water quality) and 100 (best water quality). These numbers are divided into 5 descriptive categories to simplify presentation. The specific variables, objectives, and time period used in the index are not specified and indeed, could vary from region to region, depending on local conditions and issues. It is recommended that at a minimum, four variables sampled at least four times be used in the calculation of the index values. It is also expected that the variables and objectives chosen will provide relevant information about a particular site. The index can be used both for tracking changes at one site over time, and for comparisons among sites. If used for the later purpose, care should be taken to ensure that there is a valid basis for comparison. Sites can be compared directly only if the same variables and objectives are used; otherwise, a comparison of the sites’ ability to meet relevant objectives must be made in terms of the category obtained. Although calculation of index values can be done by hand, this is not practical for even a moderate number of sites, objectives, or samples. An Excel macro that automates the process is available upon request.

Keywords: Water quality, CCMEWQI

Introduction

CCME Water Quality Index

An integral part of any environmental monitoring program is the reporting of results to both managers and the general public. This poses a particular problem in the case of water quality monitoring because of the complexity associated with analyzing a large number of measured variables. The traditional practice has been to produce reports describing trends and compliance with official guidelines or other objectives on a variable by variable basis. The advantage of this approach is that it provides a wealth of data and information; however, in many cases, managers and the general public have neither the inclination nor the training to study these reports in detail. Rather, they require statements concerning the general health or status of the system of concern.

One possible solution to this problem is to reduce the multivariate nature of water quality data by employing an index that will mathematically combine all water quality measures and provide a general and readily understood description of water. In this way, the index can be used to assess water quality relative to its desirable state (as defined by water quality objectives) and to provide insight into the degree to which water quality is affected by human activity. An index is a useful tool for describing the state of the water column, sediments and aquatic life and for ranking the suitability of water for use by humans, aquatic life, wildlife, etc.

An index can be used to reflect the overall and ongoing condition of the water. As with most monitoring programs, an index will not usually show the effect of spills, and other such random and transient events, unless these are relatively frequent or long lasting. Although there have been a variety of attempts to create such a water quality index, the most successful attempt to date appears to be the index developed by the British Columbia Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks (Rocchini and Swain 1995). This index has been adopted for use by a number of provinces, including Manitoba (Manitoba Environment 1997).

The index is based on a combination of three factors:

  1. the number of variables whose objectives are not met, (Scope)
  2. the frequency with which the objectives are not met, (Frequency) and
  3. the amount by which the objectives are not met, (Amplitude).

These are combined to produce a single value (between 0 and 100) that describes water quality.

Unlike some earlier indices, the basic BC formulation captures all key components of water quality, is easily calculated, and is sufficiently flexible that it can be applied in a variety of situations. The index can be very useful in tracking water quality changes at a given site over time and can also be used to compare directly among sites that employ the same variables and objectives. However, if the variables and objectives that feed into the index vary across sites, comparing among sites can be complicated. In these cases, it is best to compare sites only as to their ability to meet relevant objectives. For example, in calculating the index for a mountain stream and a prairie river, one might employ different nutrient objectives but the sites could still be compared as to their rank (e.g., both sites are ranked as “Good” under the index).

Uses and Limitation:

It is used as a tool to convert huge data set of observed variables into a single numerical value which elicit the water quality as per quality scale.
It doesn’t elaborate the contribution of any individual variable in estimation of water quality.

Categorization Table

It is used as a tool to convert huge data set of observed variables into a single numerical value which elicit the water quality as per quality scale.
It doesn’t elaborate the contribution of any individual variable in estimation of water quality.

Standards Required

Each country has their own specific standards. Any national or international water quality standards is required for area/country specific, ex. For anywhere in India BIS and CPCB could be use. It totally depends on users to compare their water quality data with any standard.

Variables Selection

The calculation of the CCME Water Quality Index requires that at least four variables, sampled a minimum of four times, be used. It is flexible with respect to the type and number of water quality variables to be tested, the period of application, and the type of water body (stream, river reach, lake, etc.) tested. These decisions are left to the user.

Calculation of CCME Water Quality Index:

After the body of water, the period of time, and the variables and objectives have been defined, each of the three factors that make up the index must be calculated. The calculation of F1 and F2 is relatively straightforward; F3 requires some additional steps.
F1 (Scope) represents the percentage of variables that do not meet their objectives at least once during the time period under consideration (“failed variables”), relative to the total number of variables measured:

\(\)

\[
F _1= \left( \frac{Number\ \ of \ \ failed\ \ variables}{Total\ \ number\ \ of \ \ variables} \right) * 100
\]

F2 (Frequency) represents the percentage of individual tests that do not meet objectives (“failed tests”):

\[
F _2= \left( \frac{Number\ \ of \ \ failed\ \ tests}{Total\ \ number\ \ of \ \ tests} \right) * 100
\]

F3 (Amplitude) represents the amount by which failed test values do not meet their objectives. F3 is calculated in three steps.

i) The number of times by which an individual concentration is greater than (or less than, when the objective is a minimum) the objective is termed an “excursion” and is expressed as follows. When the test value must not exceed the objective:

\[
excursion_i= \left( \frac{Failed \ \
tests\ \ value_i }{Objective_i} \right) – 1
\]

Case Studies based on CCME Water Quality Index

Disinfection with chlorine is a common practice to ensure secured drinking water, but results in potentially harmfuldisinfection by-products (DBPs), when excess chlorination is done. The US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) hasestablished Stage 1 and Stage 2 disinfection by-product Rules (DBP rules) to control DBP exposure. A modified version ofthe Canadian Council of Ministries of the Environment water quality index (CCME WQI) is used to assess water quality. CCME Water Quality Index is a globally accepted index to assess water quality, but is too generic to be used for DBP rules. The studydeveloped a scheme to make the index suitable for DBP rules. A scoring method based on an analytic hierarchy process(AHP) is applied to assign weights based on DBP rules. A previously modified CCME WQI (Islam et al., 2014) is adaptedalong with the weights to perform the assessment at the distribution network (DN). A case study was performed on 7sampling stations in a Québec City DN. The spatial water quality variations are presented using kriging – a geostatisticalmethod, which identifies the regions with relatively poor water quality and highlights the potential locations forre-chlorination points. The proposed assessment formulation is flexible to handle situations with limited data, which makesit especially suited to smaller municipalities.

References

Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment. 2001. Canadianwater quality guidelines for the protection of aquatic life: CCME Water Quality Index 1.0, Technical Report. In: Canadianenvironmental quality guidelines, 1999, Canadian Council ofMinisters of the Environment, Winnipeg.

Scroll to Top